ARTICLE: Low-Carb? Low-Fat? Study Finds Calories Count More
In the linked article we are told that for losing weight it doesn’t matter what you eat as long as you eat very few calories. OK. I’ll buy that. If you really want an aggressive weight loss program commit to a 10-day fast. I promise you that you will shed pounds.
Does anyone take the position of this straw man? Who’s arguing that extreme calorie reduction won’t cause you to lose weight? I’ve seen any number of people basically starve themselves on shakes or cleansing diets. The weight comes off but where’s the health? I see weak people who are now skinny. If weight is your only goal then this plan should work just fine.
Let’s look at a few portions of the article:
“As the world grapples with rising obesity, millions have turned to popular diets like Atkins, Zone and Ornish that tout the benefits of one nutrient over another.”
I sure tout the benefits of eating lots of fresh vegetables, some fresh fruits and eating animals that were treated well and raised in their natural environments. I certainly will tell you to eliminate or at least vastly reduce your dependence on grain based food products. I eat very little grain based carbs and eat an uncalculateable (I made that up I think) number of calories from protein and fat sources. The implication here is that the quality of your calories plays no role. Maybe they were misquoted.
“The hidden secret is it doesn’t matter if you focus on low-fat or low-carb,” said Dr. Elizabeth Nabel, director of the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, which funded the research.
I guess we don’t argue about this to the extent that not eating fat or not eating carbs will have a weight reducing affect on your body. The Hidden Secret is that a nutritional equivalency is being set up where there is no equivalency exists. To imply that low-carb and low-fat are essentially the same is wrong.
Lead researcher Dr. Frank Sacks of Harvard said a restricted calorie diet gives people greater food choices, making the diet less monotonous.
With all due respect to Dr. Frank Sacks of Harvard, he should get out more, specifically with people who eat high fat, high protein, low carb diets. The feast you can put together while not including grains is substantial, beautiful, tasty and will help you lose weight. Did you just yell at me for not being scientific?
“Before Debbie Mayer, 52, enrolled in the study, she was a “stress eater” who would snack all day and had no sense of portion control. Mayer used to run marathons in her 30s, but health problems prevented her from doing much exercise in recent years.”
Mayer tinkered with different diets — Weight Watchers, Atkins, South Beach — with little success.
“I’ve been battling my weight all my life. I just needed more structure,” said Mayer, of Brockton, Mass., who works with the elderly.
That’s anecdotal. Here’s my anecdotal evidence…
I won’t bring up names but how about the guy I know who dropped 15 pounds in 3 weeks committed to the Paleo diet? He ate whatever he wanted, whenever he wanted he just made sure it was from the expansive paleo menu.
How about me? I was a Zone adherent for quite awhile and decided to go Paleo. I didn’t change anything but I dropped 95% of the grains from my diet. I didn’t sleep more or change my workout schedule. I leaned up to the tune of 10 pounds in about 6 weeks. I guarantee you that my calories increased. I increased my fat intake A LOT.
Enough is enough. Claiming that a low calorie diet is effective whether the calories come from fat or carbohydrates isn’t the same as saying they are both healthy ways to eat. What I find unacceptable is when the issue of weight is discussed as an end unto itself. I understand, for many, weight is all that matters. We are different around here. What you put into your body affects more than your body weight. For us, weight is a symptom, something that happens based on the nutrition and fitness choices we make. Eat real food, not food products, avoid grains, eat a paleo-style diet, and get some intense exercise. Because a bunch of MDs build some nutritional equivalency based on a result that has little relation to healthy eating, people will assume that the quality of their calories doesn’t matter. Maybe they were just misquoted.